
It took an extra thirty-six hours, severe weather and a little extra heat from Brad Lidge to get them here, but here they are indeed -- your 2008 World Champs the Philadelphia Phillies!
And an extra big congrats to "The Ageless Wonder," Jamie Moyer!

We aren’t throwing in the towel so much as calling a time-out. For now, though, we are closed for business.We’ve come to a pause in an era. The economy, the credit crunch, the changing way people consume music have all lead us to today.
All existing orders have been cancelled. Orders paid by Paypal are being refunded.
Now is it time to clean up, clean out, and consider the future.
There are many terrific places to purchase music on-line. Please continue supporting independent artists.
It is always sad to see an organization that supports independent artists and the minor labels have to pack it in because there just isn't enough enough money flowing into the industry and these artists. Jeff Weiss mentions the economy and I wonder what the numbers reflect--are people ceasing to purchase music with the economy tanking? Does this closing reflect the iTunes surge? Or are people simply downloading music illegally?
We have laughed as Tina Fey has mimicked Sarah Palin’s down home demeanor. We cringed as Katie Couric threw her traditional soft ball questions at the Republican nominee for the vice presidency, cringing more at her inability to answer the questions than at Ms. Couric’s lack of journalistic prowess. We’ve discussed Palin’s clothing; whether or not she needs corrective lenses; and, what exactly the phrase “lipstick on a pig” denotes. We found it comical when Matt Damon asked what Palin really does believe about dinosaurs. Unfortunately for the Palin family, we have speculated as to what family planning means in their household with their eldest daughter, still a teen, expecting a child. We sat awestruck as Governor Palin walked out on the debate stage and asked the senior senator from Delaware if she could call him Joe.
And then, in the answer to one highly important question, it ceased being funny.
When asked what she believes to be the role of the Vice President of the United States and whether she agrees with current Vice President Cheney’s interpretation of his office, everything we have said about Sarah Palin in the past months suddenly dissipated. It no longer mattered if her husband was a member of a group that wished to secede from the Union. It no longer mattered if she understood what the Bush Doctrine is. Her answer to one question would erase all that might come later. All of it would no longer matter: The $150,000 the RNC poured into her wardrobe; her cameo on that bastion of liberalism, Saturday Night Live; and, her reference to the friends of Senator Obama as known terrorists.
Her nationally televised interpretation of the United States Constitution as it pertains to the role of the Vice President of the United States was precisely when the candidacy of Sarah Palin stopped being funny.
The exact transcript of this exchange during the 2008 Vice Presidential Debate:
IFILL: Everybody gets extra credit tonight. We're going to move on to the next question. Governor, you said in July that someone would have to explain to you exactly what it is the vice president does every day. You, senator, said, you would not be vice president under any circumstances. Now maybe this was just what was going on at the time. But tell us now, looking forward, what it is you think the vice presidency is worth now.
PALIN: In my comment there, it was a lame attempt at a joke and yours was a lame attempt at a joke, too, I guess, because nobody got it. Of course we know what a vice president does.
BIDEN: They didn't get yours or mine? Which one didn't they get?
PALIN: No, no. Of course, we know what a vice president does. And that's not only to preside over the Senate and will take that position very seriously also. I'm thankful that the Constitution would allow a bit more authority given to the vice president if that vice president so chose to exert it in working with the Senate and making sure that we are supportive of the president's policies and making sure too that our president understands what our strengths are. John McCain and I have had good conversations about where I would lead with his agenda, and that is energy independence in America and reform of government over all, and then working with families of children with special needs. That's near and dear to my heart also. And in those arenas, John McCain has already tapped me and said, that's where I want you, I want you to lead. And I said, I can't wait to get and there go to work with you.
[Biden’s response omitted for the sake of length, also his response to this first question was irrelevant to what follows.]
IFILL: Governor, you mentioned a moment ago that the Constitution might give the vice president more power than it has in the past. Do you believe as Vice President Cheney does, that the Executive Branch does not hold complete sway over the office of the vice presidency, that it is also a member of the Legislative Branch?
PALIN: Well, our founding fathers were very wise there in allowing through the Constitution much flexibility there in the Office of the Vice President. And we will do what is best for the American people in tapping into that position and ushering in an agenda that is supportive and cooperative with the president's agenda in that position. Yeah, so I do agree with him that we have a lot of flexibility in there, and we'll do what we have to do to administer very appropriately the plans that are needed for this nation.
And it is my executive experience that is partly to be attributed to my pick as V.P. with McCain, not only as a governor, but earlier on as a mayor, as an oil and gas regulator, as a business owner. It is those years of experience on an executive level that will be put to good use in the White House also.
[Emphasis is mine.]
IFILL: Vice President Cheney's interpretation of the vice presidency?
BIDEN: Vice President Cheney has been the most dangerous vice president we've had probably in American history. The idea he doesn't realize that Article I of the Constitution defines the role of the vice president of the United States, that's the Executive Branch. He works in the Executive Branch. He should understand that. Everyone should understand that.
And the primary role of the vice president of the United States of America is to support the president of the United States of America, give that president his or her best judgment when sought, and as vice president, to preside over the Senate, only in a time when in fact there's a tie vote. The Constitution is explicit.
The only authority the vice president has from the legislative standpoint is the vote, only when there is a tie vote. He has no authority relative to the Congress. The idea he's part of the Legislative Branch is a bizarre notion invented by Cheney to aggrandize the power of a unitary executive and look where it has gotten us. It has been very dangerous.
Yes, Senator Biden, the Constitution is explicit. In fact, Article I of the Constitution states: “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.” The existence of the title of “Vice President” in Article I does not suggest that the Vice President is a legislative being in the same manner that congressmen are, just as the title of “President” appearing within Article I does not suggest the President exists as an operative within both the legislative and executive branches of government. To state otherwise suggests both ignorance toward our oldest governing document and a level of contempt for the rules that have successfully upheld our nation in its young, but challenged existence.
Interestingly enough, the greatest power granted to the Vice President is not one envisioned by or carefully crafted in the first articles of the Constitution by the founding fathers, it is a power reassured and reasserted by an amendment added to the Constitution in 1967. Of equal interest is the fact that the first test of the Twenty-fifth Amendment came with the appointment of a man for the vice presidency who would not only go on to become President of the United States, but would also bring in as his Chief of Staff one Richard Bruce Cheney.
Whatever the consequences of Mr. Cheney’s many attempts for aggrandizement, it cannot be said that Cheney acted blindly with no knowledge of how the Vice President of the United States should behave on a moral, ethical, or constitutional level. His first White House job offered him a front row seat to the operations of a man who not only understood the finer details of the Constitution, but was in many ways a product of those very details. Just as his first oval office boss understood the distinction between the executive branch and the legislative branch, including that distinction as it applies to the vice president, Dick Cheney understood the distinctions.
Cheney’s actions that have harmed the constitutional foundation of this nation were not achieved with innocent abandon. He acknowledged the precedent and knowingly took the step to deceive. Whether Palin innocently suggested what she did with very little knowledge of what is actually outlined by the Constitution or not, she is just as dangerous and potentially detrimental to the Constitution of the United States as Vice President Cheney has been.
Given that the American League won the All-Star Game at Yankee Stadium back in July, the American League contender--the Rays--will have home field advantage. For the first time in awhile, home field advantage may play an even bigger role in the World Series. Assuming that the 2005 World Series was played at Minute Maid Park instead of the Astrodome and the 1995 Series was at Progressive Field, it has been quite some time since a home team's advantage has come on turf. Not only will astroturf play a prominent role in the game, the dome at Tropicana Field will prove to be an obstacle. Perhaps the last time turf played a role in the Series was back in the early 90s--1991 at Minnesota and '92 and '93 at Toronto.World SeriesGame 1: Wed. Oct. 22 @ Tampa Bay, 8pm
Game 2: Thurs. Oct. 23 @ Tampa Bay, 8pm
Game 3: Fri. Oct. 25 @ Philadelphia, 8pm
Game 4: Sun. Oct. 26 @ Philadelphia, 8 pm
Game 5: Mon. Oct. 27 @ Philadelphia, 8 pm
Game 6: Wed. Oct. 29 @ Tampa Bay, 8 pm
Game 7: Thurs. Oct. 30 @ Tampa Bay, 8 pm
Coming Out DayBefore I can continue, I must provide a shortened background of Monty Ledford. Not mentioned in today's editorial is Ledford's faith. Ledford is the pastor of the First Mennonite Church of Aberdeen. His letters usually warn of the damages of worldliness. However, he will write on whatever social ill appears prominent at that time. He ranges from railing against illegal immigration to any number of government accepted programs. As far as I can tell, Ledford does not believe sex education should be taught in schools, if he believes in public schooling at all. He is constantly harping on the notion that individuals are entirely responsible for their actions and beliefs--that their religion, faith, culture, etc. is not to blame. In fact, back in the 1970s, Ledford was a pastor at the Kempton Mennonite Fellowship in Kempton, Pennsylvania, and he said this back then:
The National Coming Out Day claims to be recognizing freedom of choice. Is there any attempt to showcase practitioners of polygamy, incest, bisexuality or adultery? (If printed estimates are any indication, those who practice the latter three behaviors are far more numerous than the exclusively homosexual.)
If not, why is the "freedom of choice" label geared to one type of behavior -- homosexuality? I do not question the motives of those who sponsor this event, but the effect is to cultivate a public tolerance for behavior which does not serve the increase of the race, the welfare of society or the health of the personality; one man and one woman for life is the best relationship to nurture human life and build society.
Monty Ledford
Aberdeen, Idaho
It is intellectual chauvinism to invoke brainwashing as the only explanation of why others are persuaded of an outlook radically differing from one's own. It is intellectual cowardice to charge the Hare Krishna people with brainwashing instead of offering as an alternative a more persuasive world view and lifestyle. And it is an insult to the intelligence of the Hare Krishna converts to maintain that they were mentally coerced into assenting to these teachings instead of admitting that they, as responsible adults, were persuaded to accept them. God's truth should not be enforced or suppressed by Government statute.Ledford doesn't appear to have much respect for religions other than his own, despite what he once contributed to an online posting regarding a book about the Mormon faith (the author of said book is of no relation to me):
I was fascinated and encouraged by the civil tone and respectful reasoning of all these comments. We cannot go wrong by treating one another as we want to be treated. My maternal ancestors came west to Salt Lake in 1847, but I was not raised LDS–yet my years here as a pastor in southern Idaho have made me appreciate more and more that we don’t have to be enemies or treat one another with contempt and insult–we may theologically have to give and take some hard knocks, but so long as we fight fair and can shake hands after the round we can be friends, and “faithful are the wounds of a friend”.Maybe I'm missing something, but it appears Mr. Ledford speaks freely from both sides of his mouth. Where is the civility he speaks of? Seems to me he has demonstrated in his letter to the editor published today a great deal of contempt and insult for those he does not agree with. I'm guessing the Mennonite Church of Aberdeen isn't one of the progressive Mennonite branches like the Germantown Mennonite Church. He has stated previously that the illegal immigrants of Bingham County have no business being supported by the county or reaping the rewards of the quality of life there. However, he has also gone on record thanking immigrants for continuing to populate the world:
Thank God for the millions of immigrants in the USA and those couples who affirm the privilege of parenthood. Without them we risk sinking into the birth dearth and decline of Europe. Bringing children into the world is a vote for the future and a mark of hope in God's promises.Maybe he should have pointed out that he was thanking the legal immigrant in the United States. And perhaps he should have mentioned then that he only supports parenthood for those who come by that gift naturally. Forget the many partners who wish to raise children together, many of whom believe in the same God as Mr. Ledford. Forget the millions of women in the United States who cannot have children of their own and wish to adopt. Is their action then a second-hand "vote for the future and a mark of hope in God's promises"?
Wednesday Update: Just in case anybody was wondering I survived yesterday, all of these rants included, and after baking enough peanut butter cookies to feed the entire United States military, all is well again. That and my good buddy in Moscow sent me a link to what could possibly be the best website EVER!!
I feel like I should say "we interrupt your regularly scheduled programming..." before this post. Somewhat odd that I wouldn't be posting about racism, hatred, tolerance, or even the myriad of things that happened on this day in history (MLK wins Nobel Prize, Cuban Missile Crisis began, Mr. Khrushchev got the boot, etc.). Just can't.
I spent the weekend attempting to read the comments following the Washington Post story about Rep. John Lewis coming to the defense of Sen. Obama. The comments made me sick. One in particular that called John Lewis the racist in this story. John Lewis for crying out loud. Haven't really let that one go. I also spent the weekend pissed off about snow. Yes, snow. Not that I can't be mad at snow, but I've never been so afraid of snow before. What if I slip? What if whatever they just did to surgically solve my back problems is undone by one fall on the ice? Anxiety about snow is worse than the actual snow. Makes me a little undone. Luckily it is nearly melted away.
And then today, at work, a woman comes in and is looking for information on a woman that was a prominent member of the community. Problem was she didn't know when the woman died so we didn't even have a death date to go with for an obituary search. I started doing some looking after the patron left and what shows up? The obituary, 90th birthday announcement, etc. I go hunting all over four floors of this building and the woman is long gone. I've been there--that place where the research material you need is right there, literally, and you can't seem to get it in your hands to finish your project. Maybe that is why I chased this lady all over the library for nothing. Hopefully she comes back.
I don't know why I cared so much about this lady's research. I'm having research dilemmas of my own. Except mine are the kind where I have all the damn research, tons of it, and no freakin' clue what to do with it. How to frame the question, how to put my research to good use. Just can't seem to.
I make lists. It is what I do. Today's list? Well there's a chart with an accompanying list. All the things that are left to complete in the Stallings Collection. All the things that are currently keeping me from getting the hell out of Pocatello and on with my life. Funny I think of it that way, because I used to think of it more in the sense of this Sister Hazel song.
We can now return to our regular programing...
Roger W. Morgan
on May 15th, 2008 at 5:16 p.m.
Just try this “innocent” little stunt in Mexico. Then tell us all about racism. For the record, you can not intimidate me in any way shape or form, by using that term as an expression of my viewpoint. If it is racism and you want to class it as such….be my guest and I will wear your label proudly.
We have had enough, paying for all their babies and medical expenses!!! They get it all for free!! We have had enough of this pandering to them as if they are so mistreated and abused….If that is so then go back to Mexico. SPEAK THE DAMN LANGUAGE!!! ASSIMILATE AND BECOME AMERICANS!!!!
My wife retired from teaching. She would tell her Mexican students that they really needed to learn ENGLISH. Their response??? verbatim it was this “F**** You we are not Americans, we are Mexicans. YOU NEED TO LEARN TO SPEAK MEXICAN.”
Talk to me about this innocent little thingy. Where do they get that idea???? FROM THEIR HOMES!!! Your white liberal guilt is really showing!!!
Let me give you a true story in SENSITIVITY AND GOODNESS. Let’s change the names and places, but the story is true. The Mendoza family does this scam each and every year. When time comes for field work to start here in Idaho, they leave McAllen Texas. Before leaving however they stop into the local welfare office and claim they are destitute. They have six children, or at least claim that many. The local welfare office gives them $1000 dollars. Of they go headed north. Upon arriving in Salt Lake City, it is a stop at the local welfare office, and claim they are destitute….another $1000 dollars to “help them out.” Then they arrive in lets pick a town, Emmett. First stop, the local welfare office where you guessed it….another $1000….to “help them out.”
So….we paid them $3000 dollars to come up here and work??? Gosh, I guess we all need some more sensitivity training.
I could go on and on. These hard working misunderstood people, who have destroyed Nampa and Caldwell. Oh I like this one….they are all just PEACE LOVING PEOPLE….and all the drive by shootings are simply a figment of our imagination. All the gang graffiti is really white AMERICANS trying to mistreat these poor misunderstood people.
GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!
You and all your ilk are the damn racists. You see everything in skin color. I see everything in CULTURE. You want to “HELP” the poor Mexican…and by your idea of HELP you are in fact enabling them to continue being the way they are. TELL THEM THE DAMN TRUTH. Here is a start, how about STOP MILKING THE WELFARE SYSTEM. Another start….TURN IN THOSE YOU KNOW WHO YOU KNOW ARE MAKING ILLEGAL IDENTIFICATIONS. Oh here is another one….STAND AND PUT YOUR HAND OVER YOUR HEART WHEN THE NATIONAL ANTHEM IS PLAYED….THIS IS THE COUNTRY THAT FEEDS YOU AND PAYS YOU TO RAISE ALL YOUR DAMN WELFARE BABIES SO SHOW SOME RESPECT.
Simpson is an avid painter, specializing in water colors. An annual campaign
fund raiser is held at which his prints are sold.
While Simpson is a Doctor of Dental Medicine (D.M.D.), he does not use the honorific "Dr." while serving in Congress, preferring to be referred to as Congressman or Mr. Simpson.
For Immediate ReleaseHistory Matters, not to be confused with the History Matters project at George Mason, can be accessed here. JFK Lancer can be accessed here or via my sidebar.
Monday, October 6, 2008
JFK Lancer Publications & Productions
Contact: Debra Conway
Email: conwayd@jfklancer.com
Rex Bradford is a computer game developer whose interest in the JFK assassination and technology experience led him to develop the History Matters web site. Bradford is Senior Analyst & Archivist at the Mary Ferrell Foundation and creator of the electronic archive of JFK documents.
The Mary Ferrell Foundation Archive is the largest searchable electronic archive of information relating to the assassinations of the 1960s and their larger historical context, including over 1,000,000 pages of declassified government documents.
Rex Bradford will be presenting information outlining the various types of records available and highlighting the newest available collections including: FBI HSCA Subject Files, Daily Logs of FBI Director Hoover, FBI Files on the Hosty Note and the LAPD Report to HSCA -An undated report from the Los Angeles Police Dept. to the House Assassinations Committee, supplying information on possible connections between the JFK and RFK murders.
The beauty in any and all conspiracy theories is that it's almost impossible to prove that something did not happen, and any evidence that punches holes in the theory is easily dismissed as part of a coverup promoted by an ever-growing circle of conspirators.He's right, the answer to all logic is that whatever the information or intelligence it must be part of the coverup. Having met my fair share of conspiracy theorists I have to agree with the frustrations of Mr. Wright. I also laughed uncontrollably at this:
Some time ago I had a call from a perfectly sincere woman who wanted to pass on her theory that the CIA and NASA conspired to fake the deaths of Marilyn Monroe (a known Mossad agent code-named Norma Jean) and JFK so they could secretly live out the rest of their days on a desert island where Marilyn gave birth to their love child, thus sparing the nation the embarrassment of learning about the president's philandering.Yes, these people really exist. Yes, they really believe it. No, I'm not one of them. This entire notion of Obama not being an American has been floating about for awhile. I suppose if there is any truth to the skepticism surrounding his birthplace there is probably an equal amount surrounding the birthplace of Senator McCain. Level the playing field, of course at the Constitution's expense, but really this isn't about who is and isn't eligible to be President, it's about the fear people like this man in Magic Valley harbor at the prospect of either of these candidates leading the free world.
Interesting theory, I said, but you have to acknowledge that there's not a shred of evidence to support it.
"Yes," she responded emphatically, "isn't it suspicious that there's no proof?"